Re: [2.6 patch] remove dummy asm/kvm.h files

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:53:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 21:32 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 07:27:16PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch removes the dummy asm/kvm.h files on architectures not (yet) 
> > > supporting KVM and uses the same conditional headers installation as
> > > already used for a.out.h .
> > > 
> > > Also removed are superfluous install rules in the s390 and x86 Kbuild 
> > > files (they are already in Kbuild.asm).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I really do not like the way we implement these checks and
> > think this should be a kconfig option.
> > But we do not (yet) require a configured kernel when exporting
> > to userspace so this is not feasible right now.
> 
> I'm _really_ dubious about doing this kind of thing through Kconfig.
> 
> In the general case, we really don't want exported headers to have any
> differences based on the kernel configuration.
> 
> Yes, I suppose it would be OK if we are very careful not to let anyone
> use config symbols that aren't hard-coded for the given architecture.
> But in practice I don't think there's any real chance that we'd manage
> to be careful _enough_. We'd find people using symbols they shouldn't
> be.
We have two cases now and I think we can manage it.
But if we have only a few cases then we can also accept use of ARCH.

> 
> > So despite the above this patch has my:
> > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > 
> > Same for the asm/a.out patch you posted the other day.
> > 
> > David - I assume you take these via your tree?
> 
> I can do.
Thanks,

	Sam