From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU Accel - git tree Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:12:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20080707171207.GB7707@shareable.org> References: <5d6222a80807041340j367cfe3ah67a9d771caa0ee63@mail.gmail.com> <20080704213844.GB29672@tapir> <5d6222a80807041427t5510c2f5y172b3674697728ef@mail.gmail.com> <48721138.1010908@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Wright , Jes Sorensen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Hollis Blanchard To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:40009 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754571AbYGGRMQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:12:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48721138.1010908@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Glauber Costa wrote: > > Talking to hollis last week, he pointed out that a better solution > > would be to make all of them to use the same kernel interface. It's a > > valid approach, but I believe an user-space interface would be more > > flexible. That's why I'm still maintaining this set (now in tree-form > > ;-) ) > > Especially in case we'll add xen to the picture ... However, don't forget that plain QEMU doesn't use a kernel interface. Does that count as a "different" kernel interface for the purpose of these hooks? :-) -- Jamie