From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch 0/2] do not run halted vcpu's
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:09:12 -0300
Message-ID: <20080801230912.013317832@localhost.localdomain>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:60105 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754555AbYHAXVa (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:21:30 -0400
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Avi Kivity wrote:

> Any reason this is not in __vcpu_run()?
>
> Our main loop could look like
>
> while (no reason to stop)
>       if (runnable)
>            enter guest
>       else
>            block
>       deal with aftermath
>
> kvm_emulate_halt would then simply modify the mp state.

Like this?

- I don't think it is necessary to test for pending signals inside irq
safe section, so move that to exit processing.

- Same for need_resched().