From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix emergency_restart (sysrq-b) with kvm loaded on
	Intel hosts
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:15:08 +0200
Message-ID: <20080825091508.GC9114@elte.hu>
References: <1219655506-27418-1-git-send-email-avi@qumranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:57512 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753601AbYHYJPT (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:15:19 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1219655506-27418-1-git-send-email-avi@qumranet.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:

> Enabling Intel VT has the curious side effect whereby the INIT signal 
> is blocked.  Rather than comment on the wisdom of this side effect, 
> this patch adds an emergency restart reboot notifier, and modifies the 
> kvm reboot notifier to disable VT on emergency reboot.

looks good to me - i was bitten by that problem on a testbox.

  Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Seems best to merge this via the KVM tree, right?

	Ingo