kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
	avi@qumranet.com
Subject: First performance numbers
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:48:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919214824.GA11410@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1221658886-14109-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>

Ok, here are some performance numbers for nested svm. I ran kernbench -M
on a virtual machine with 4G RAM and 1 VCPU (since nesting SMP guests
do currently not work). I measured simple virtualization with a shadow
paging guest on bare metal and within a nested guest (same guest image)
on a nested paging enabled first level guest.

                 | Shadow Guest (100%) | Nested Guest (X)  | X
-----------------+---------------------+-------------------+--------
Elapsed Time     | 553.244 (1.21208)   | 1185.95 (20.0365) | 214.363%
User Time        | 407.728 (0.987279)  | 520.434 (8.55643) | 127.642% 
System Time      | 144.828 (0.480645)  | 664.528 (11.6648) | 458.839%
Percent CPU      | 99 (0)              | 99 (0)            | 100.000%
Context Switches | 98265.2 (183.001)   | 220015 (3302.74)  | 223.899%
Sleeps           | 49397.8 (31.0274)   | 49460.2 (364.84)  | 100.126%

So we have an overall slowdown in the first nesting level of more than
50%. Mostly because we spend so much time in the system level. Seems
there is some work to do for performance improvements :-)

Joerg

-- 
           |           AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
 Operating |         Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
 System    |                  Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
 Research  |              General Partner authorized to represent:
 Center    |             AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
           | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-19 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17 13:41 [PATCH 0/9] Add support for nested SVM (kernel) v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] Add CPUID feature flag for SVM v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41   ` [PATCH 2/9] Clean up VINTR setting v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41     ` [PATCH 3/9] Add helper functions for nested SVM v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41       ` [PATCH 4/9] Implement GIF, clgi and stgi v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41         ` [PATCH 5/9] Implement hsave v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41           ` [PATCH 6/9] Add VMLOAD and VMSAVE handlers v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41             ` [PATCH 7/9] Add VMRUN handler v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41               ` [PATCH 8/9] Add VMEXIT handler and intercepts v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-17 13:41                 ` [PATCH 9/9] Allow setting the SVME bit v3 Alexander Graf
2008-09-19 15:59               ` [PATCH 7/9] Add VMRUN handler v3 Joerg Roedel
2008-09-25 17:32                 ` Alexander Graf
2008-09-25 17:37                   ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-25 20:00                     ` Alexander Graf
2008-09-25 21:22                       ` joro
2008-09-27 12:59                         ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-27 12:58                       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-25 18:47         ` [PATCH 4/9] Implement GIF, clgi and stgi v3 Joerg Roedel
2008-09-25 19:55           ` Alexander Graf
2008-09-25 21:27             ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-26  9:01               ` Alexander Graf
2008-09-27 12:55                 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-27 12:52           ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-19 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/9] Add support for nested SVM (kernel) v3 Joerg Roedel
2008-09-19 14:39   ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-19 15:56   ` Joerg Roedel
2008-10-15 17:07     ` Alexander Graf
2008-09-19 21:48 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2008-09-20  1:30   ` First performance numbers Avi Kivity
2008-09-20  6:55     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080919214824.GA11410@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).