public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Ahern" <daahern@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] KVM: MMU: out of sync shadow core v2
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:45:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080921004515.GC10120@dmt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D4506C.5070804@redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:22:52PM -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Instead of private, have an object contain both callback and private  
> data, and use container_of().  Reduces the chance of type errors.

OK.

>> +	while (parent->unsync_children) {
>> +		for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; ++i) {
>> +			u64 ent = sp->spt[i];
>> +
>> +			if (is_shadow_present_pte(ent)) {
>> +				struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
>> +				child = page_header(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
>
> What does this do?

Walks all children of given page with no efficiency. Its replaced later
by the bitmap version.

>> +static int kvm_sync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>> +{
>> +	if (sp->role.glevels != vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level) {
>> +		kvm_mmu_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
>>   
>
> Suppose we switch to real mode, touch a pte, switch back.  Is this handled?

The shadow page will go unsync on pte touch and resynced as soon as its
visible (after return to paging).

Or, while still in real mode, it might be zapped by
kvm_mmu_get_page->kvm_sync_page.

Am I missing something?

>> @@ -991,8 +1066,18 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_
>>  		 gfn, role.word);
>>  	index = kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn);
>>  	bucket = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[index];
>> -	hlist_for_each_entry(sp, node, bucket, hash_link)
>> -		if (sp->gfn == gfn && sp->role.word == role.word) {
>> +	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, tmp, bucket, hash_link)
>> +		if (sp->gfn == gfn) {
>> +			if (sp->unsync)
>> +				if (kvm_sync_page(vcpu, sp))
>> +					continue;
>> +
>> +			if (sp->role.word != role.word)
>> +				continue;
>> +
>> +			if (sp->unsync_children)
>> +				vcpu->arch.mmu.need_root_sync = 1;
>>   
>
> mmu_reload() maybe?

Hum, will think about it.

>>  static int kvm_mmu_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>>   
>
> Why does the caller care if zap also zapped some other random pages?  To  
> restart walking the list?

Yes. The next element for_each_entry_safe saved could have been zapped.

>> +	/* don't unsync if pagetable is shadowed with multiple roles */
>> +	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(s, node, n, bucket, hash_link) {
>> +		if (s->gfn != sp->gfn || s->role.metaphysical)
>> +			continue;
>> +		if (s->role.word != sp->role.word)
>> +			return 1;
>> +	}
>>   
>
> This will happen for nonpae paging.  But why not allow it?  Zap all  
> unsynced pages on mode switch.
>
> Oh, if a page is both a page directory and page table, yes.  

Yes. 

> So to allow nonpae oos, check the level instead.

Windows 2008 64-bit has all sorts of sharing a pagetable at multiple
levels too.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-21  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-18 21:27 [patch 00/10] out of sync shadow v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 01/10] KVM: MMU: split mmu_set_spte Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 02/10] KVM: MMU: move local TLB flush to mmu_set_spte Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  0:21   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 03/10] KVM: MMU: do not write-protect large mappings Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  0:29   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-21  0:41     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 04/10] KVM: MMU: mode specific sync_page Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  0:44   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 05/10] KVM: MMU: sync roots on mmu reload Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 06/10] KVM: x86: trap invlpg Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  0:53   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-21  0:43     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 07/10] KVM: MMU: mmu_parent_walk Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  0:56   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-21  0:44     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-22 20:30       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-22 22:04         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 08/10] KVM: MMU: awareness of new kvm_mmu_zap_page behaviour Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 09/10] KVM: MMU: out of sync shadow core v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  1:22   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-21  0:45     ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2008-09-22 20:41       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-22 21:55         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-22 22:51           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-23 10:46             ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-23 10:46           ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-23 13:17             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-18 21:27 ` [patch 10/10] KVM: MMU: speed up mmu_unsync_walk Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  1:26   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-21  0:45     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-22 20:43       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-18 22:36 ` [patch 00/10] out of sync shadow v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-09-20  1:28   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080921004515.GC10120@dmt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=daahern@cisco.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox