Re: [patch 10/10] KVM: MMU: speed up mmu_unsync_walk

Avi Kivity
2008-09-22T20:43:19Z

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Also, it may make sense to replace it with an array of u16s.
>>
>
> Why?
>

They'll be usually empty or near-empty, no? In which case the array is
faster and smaller.

But I don't think the difference is measurable. So scratch that remark.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.