From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: KVM for Sparc?
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080922.132623.23838166.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <f43fc5580809210552sdf3ee24w8922ac25f93fb75@mail.gmail.com>
	<48D7F33D.90007@codemonkey.ws>
	<1222114719.3967.43.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: anthony@codemonkey.ws, blauwirbel@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, levon@movementarian.org
To: hollisb@us.ibm.com
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43069
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751424AbYIVU0f (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:26:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1222114719.3967.43.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:18:39 -0500

> It would be even more interesting to implement host support on the Sparc
> processors with hardware virtualization support.

That's just a lot of protocol and userland work, rather than much
kernel stuff.

To me it's less interesting, to be honest.