From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] VMX: work around lacking VNMI support
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:35:20 +0300
Message-ID: <20080924133520.GK3072@minantech.com>
References: <200809231742.03316.sheng.yang@intel.com> <20080923094544.GE3072@minantech.com> <200809231750.49882.sheng.yang@intel.com> <48DA3532.9040306@siemens.com> <20080924125057.GF3072@minantech.com> <48DA3908.2000204@siemens.com> <20080924130236.GG3072@minantech.com> <48DA3BB4.80708@siemens.com> <20080924132412.GJ3072@minantech.com> <48DA4199.10900@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:37629 "EHLO il.qumranet.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751234AbYIXNfW (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:35:22 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48DA4199.10900@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:33:13PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:08:04PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> It does power-off, but hands during reboot. Looking at it right now.
> >> After completing the RAM read-back from disk? This is where it hangs
> > Much earlier. BIOS hangs because CPU1 ignores SIPI.
> 
> That sounds like an APIC state reset issue.
> 
> BTW, I'm getting tons of
> 
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 0
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 1
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 0
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 1
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 1
> SIPI to vcpu 1 vector 0x24
> vcpu 1 received sipi with vector # 24
> SIPI to vcpu 1 vector 0x24
> SIPI to vcpu 1 vector 0x24
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 0
> Ignoring de-assert INIT to vcpu 1
> SIPI to vcpu 1 vector 0x24
> 
> on my box with SMP guests (Linux and Windows). Do they all point to yet
> incomplete emulations, or are they just far too verbose?
> 
Not sure about de-assert messages but others are fine.

--
			Gleb.