From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
joerg.roedel@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, amit.shah@qumranet.com, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86/iommu: use dma_ops_list in get_dma_ops
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:25:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080929092549.GA6931@il.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080928184424.GA26563@8bytes.org>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:44:24PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hmm, we should only call find_dma_ops_for_device() the first time a
> dma api call is done (look into get_dma_ops). But I also thought
> about how this lock can be avoided. In the real world it should not
> be necessary because the dma_ops list is initialized before dma api
> calls are done. But since there is now a register function which can
> be called its safer this way. What do you think, are we still safe
> enough without this lock?
We could be, if we add a check to the register function that verifies
it isn't being called after DMAs have started. Something like:
in register:
if (dma_started)
yell loudly
before PCI device initialization and after IOMMU initialization:
dma_started = true
Cheers,
Muli
--
The First Workshop on I/O Virtualization (WIOV '08)
Dec 2008, San Diego, CA, http://www.usenix.org/wiov08/
xxx
SYSTOR 2009---The Israeli Experimental Systems Conference
http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/conferences/systor2009/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 18:21 [PATCH 0/9][RFC] stackable dma_ops for x86 Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/iommu: add necessary types for stackable dma_ops Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/iommu: add stackable dma_ops registration interface Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/iommu: change PCI-NOMMU to use dma_ops register interface Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/iommu: change SWIOTLB " Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/iommu: change GART " Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/iommu: change Calgary " Joerg Roedel
2008-09-23 14:37 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-30 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 11:58 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-30 13:30 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-30 15:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 18:33 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/iommu: change AMD IOMMU " Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/iommu: change Intel " Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/iommu: use dma_ops_list in get_dma_ops Joerg Roedel
2008-09-26 7:56 ` Amit Shah
2008-09-26 8:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-26 10:49 ` Amit Shah
2008-09-26 12:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-27 0:13 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-28 19:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-29 9:30 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-29 9:36 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-29 13:16 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-29 13:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-30 19:44 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-10-01 7:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-10-03 8:38 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-09-26 11:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-28 14:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-28 18:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-29 9:25 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda [this message]
2008-09-29 9:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-22 18:36 ` [PATCH 0/9][RFC] stackable dma_ops for x86 Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-22 18:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-23 2:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-23 2:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-28 14:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-28 18:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-29 13:16 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-29 13:26 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-29 13:42 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-29 13:51 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080929092549.GA6931@il.ibm.com \
--to=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@qumranet.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).