Re: unhandled vm exit: 0x80000021 vcpu_id 0

[Sheng Yang <yasker@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:16:20AM +0200, p.quida@tiscali.it wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I understand the "particularity" (checkpoint) of this case.

Hi Pier

Thanks for your understanding. :)
> 
> Any way, in the attachment the dmesg log and the output of the dmesg 
> command.

But it's strange that I almost can't see anything correlated with kvm in the
log. If you built kvm as a modules(I suppose you did it because you tried
many versions), at least something like "load kvm module xxx" should
appear(and Windows always trig a apic write error before Jan's patch make
them slience).

Is this the dmesg when the error was happening?

--
regards
Yang, Sheng

> 
> thanks for your helpfulness.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:18 PM, p.quida@tiscali.it <p.quida@tiscali.
> it> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi,
> >> I have successfully installed windows XP SP2 on kvm. After the
> >> installation I have launched the setup of  "Checkpoint - Pointsec" 
> for
> >> the entire disk encryption.
> >>     
> >
> > Hi Pier
> >
> > Can you issue a bug for this? But sadly "Checkpoint" is a commercial
> > software, we may not deal with it directly and immediately.
> >
> >   
> >> The first step of installation was run successfully, but when the
> >> system reboots and "Pointsec" loads the initial code, the following
> >> error happens:
> >> 
> ======================================================================================
> >> unhandled vm exit: 0x80000021 vcpu_id 0
> >> rax 0000000000000007 rbx 0000000000001490 rcx 0000000000000000 rdx
> >> 00000000000019a0
> >> rsi 0000000000000000 rdi 0000000000000000 rsp 0000000000000080 rbp
> >> 00000000000096bf
> >> r8  0000000000000000 r9  0000000000000000 r10 0000000000000000 r11
> >> 0000000000000000
> >> r12 0000000000000000 r13 0000000000000000 r14 0000000000000000 r15
> >> 0000000000000000
> >> rip 000000000000002a rflags 00023202
> >> cs 14a2 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 9 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> ds 19a0 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 0 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> es 1a31 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 0 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> ss 1a29 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 1 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> fs 0000 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 0 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> gs 0000 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 0 l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> tr 0058 (00201ffa/0000ffff p 1 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type b l 0 g 0 avl 0)
> >> ldt 0000 (00000000/00000000 p 0 dpl 0 db 0 s 0 type 0 l 0 g 0 avl 
> 0)
> >> gdt 200000/1dd8
> >> idt 201df0/188
> >> cr0 80000019 cr2 0 cr3 1440000 cr4 0 cr8 0 efer 0
> >>     
> >
> > What's this... CR0.PE clear, CR0.PG set... And segment register also
> > strange. May be some real emulation wrong...
> >
> >   
> >> Aborted
> >> 
> ======================================================================================
> >> I am able to boot this system (image) using qemu (with kqemu 
> enabled
> >> for user code), but not using kvm.
> >> I have also tried with the options: -no-kvm-irqchip -no-kvm-pit -
> no-
> >> acpi without success. Only the -no-kvm option works.
> >> I have tried these kvm releases: from 65 to 76; and these kernel
> >> (vanilla) releases: from 2.6.23.1 to 2.6.26.5.
> >>     
> >
> > Thanks for your patient...
> >   
> >> My computer is a Dell D630 equipped with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
> >> T7300  @ 2.00GHz
> >> The HOST Linux distributions used are: Fedora 8/9 for i386, and 
> Fedora
> >> 9 for x86_64.
> >>     
> >
> > Can you show dmesg as well? That's also helps.
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Con Tiscali Adsl 8 Mega navighi SENZA LIMITI e GRATIS PER I PRIMI TRE MESI. In seguito paghi solo ??? 19,95 al mese. Attivala subito, l?offerta è valida fino al 02/10/2008! http://abbonati.tiscali.it/promo/adsl8mega/