From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: Add assigned_device_msi_dispatch() Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:17:32 +0800 Message-ID: <200811041917.33216.sheng@linux.intel.com> References: <1225428647-27614-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <1225428647-27614-9-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <49102F2F.4060404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:17627 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752442AbYKDLU1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:20:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49102F2F.4060404@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 04 November 2008 19:17:03 Avi Kivity wrote: > Sheng Yang wrote: > > The function is used to dispatch MSI to lapic according to MSI message > > address and message data. > > > > (Any way to replace macro GET_VAL_FROM_SHIFT()?) > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > +#include > > +#endif > > The include can be unconditional. it's pity that IA64 don't have this head file... I will separate the msi.c and add this later. > > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > +static void assigned_device_msi_dispatch(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel > > *dev) +{ > > +#define GET_VAL_FROM_SHIFT(v, s) (((v) & (1 << s)) >> s) > > test_bit() ? Oh, indeed here. :) > > > + int vcpu_id; > > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > > + struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = ioapic_irqchip(dev->kvm); > > + u8 dest_id = (dev->guest_msi_addr & MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK) > > + >> MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT; > > + u8 vector = (dev->guest_msi_data & MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK) > > + >> MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT; > > + u8 dest_mode = GET_VAL_FROM_SHIFT(dev->guest_msi_addr, > > + MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_SHIFT); > > + u8 trig_mode = GET_VAL_FROM_SHIFT(dev->guest_msi_data, > > + MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT); > > + u8 delivery_mode = GET_VAL_FROM_SHIFT(dev->guest_msi_data, > > + MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_MODE_SHIFT); > > int is usually better than u8. OK. > > > + u32 deliver_bitmask; > > + > > + case MSI_DATA_DELIVERY_FIXED_VAL: > > + for (vcpu_id = 0; deliver_bitmask != 0; vcpu_id++) { > > __ffs() and __clear_bit() can make this a bit faster. Can be done later > though. OK, also would optimize IOAPIC side later. -- regards Yang, Sheng