public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com,
	anthony@codemonkey.ws, Sander.Vanleeuwen@sun.com,
	zach@vmware.com, brogers@novell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Activate Virtualization On Demand v2
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:58:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081105105812.GC25523@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225874896-13186-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:48:16AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> X86 CPUs need to have some magic happening to enable the virtualization
> extensions on them. This magic can result in unpleasant results for
> users, like blocking other VMMs from working (vmx) or using invalid TLB
> entries (svm).
> 
> Currently KVM activates virtualization when the respective kernel module
> is loaded. This blocks us from autoloading KVM modules without breaking
> other VMMs.
> 
> To circumvent this problem at least a bit, this patch introduces on
> demand activation of virtualization. This means, that instead
> virtualization is enabled on creation of the first virtual machine
> and disabled on removal of the last one.

Pardon my unfamiliarity with the code, but with this change applied,
will we still get an explicit error at time of loading kvm-intel.ko
if VMX were disabled in the BIOS ? Or will that error reporting be 
pushed off to time when VMX is first activated ?

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-05 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-05  8:48 [PATCH] Activate Virtualization On Demand v2 Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 10:06 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-05 10:28   ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 10:45     ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-05 10:53       ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 11:23       ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 10:45 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2008-11-05 10:54   ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 10:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2008-11-05 11:01   ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 13:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-05 13:12   ` Avi Kivity
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-15 11:30 Alexander Graf
2009-06-15 12:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-15 12:25   ` Alexander Graf
2009-06-15 12:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-16 14:02   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-16 14:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-16 14:08   ` Alexander Graf
2009-06-16 15:13     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-17 21:56       ` Alexander Graf
2009-06-18  8:35         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081105105812.GC25523@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=Sander.Vanleeuwen@sun.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=brogers@novell.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox