From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kristoffer Ericson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:33:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> References: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715" Cc: Thomas Mueller , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:65327 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755558AbYLFMce (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 07:32:34 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so166524eyi.37 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:32:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Thomas Mueller wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual > > network and not 802.1Q . > >=20 > > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then > > mark vlan option deprecated somehow. >=20 > my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once. >=20 Same here. > - Thomas >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Kristoffer Ericson --Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk6fzoACgkQPQls10ERAGe8uQCeJc9c94GP5nTlh2JrA3uUbVPA Q8kAnA5uS8QhXUra1DGqfyaZC2KVwLQZ =HyMg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__6_Dec_2008_14_33_46_+0100_R3k=9Bpj50VjD715--