From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ?
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:14:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20081206181442.GA8326@shareable.org>
References: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> <ghdpgd$6u5$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:48103 "EHLO
	mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751127AbYLFSOp (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:14:45 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081206143346.0b447bdd.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> > > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual
> > > network and not 802.1Q .
> > > 
> > > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then
> > > mark vlan option deprecated somehow.
> > 
> > my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once.
> 
> Same here.

Me too! :-)

-- Jamie