Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU

[Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge it in
> > three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my IOMMU
> > updates which has to happen in that order).
> > The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send to
> > Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all these
> > changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master.
> > Is this acceptable for everyone?
> > 
> > David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this single
> > pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued in your
> > tree? Is this ok for you?
> 
> Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's patch
> set from Monday first? Or just let you do that?

I already did it on-top of your tree because Han Weidong's patches 1-17
were rebased to your tree and my IOMMU-API patches apply on-top of his
patches.

Joerg

-- 
           |           AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
 Operating |         Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
 System    |                  Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
 Research  |              General Partner authorized to represent:
 Center    |             AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
           | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy