From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 5] add can_dma/post_dma for direct IO
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:39:44 +0100
Message-ID: <20081213143944.GD30537@random.random>
References: <cc5d812eb9369a7ad2ef.1229105804@duo.random> <4942B841.6010900@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56154 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752132AbYLMOjv (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:39:51 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4942B841.6010900@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:15:13PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> void *cpu_physical_memory_map(target_phys_addr_t addr, ram_addr_t size, int 
> is_write);

Just a side note (doesn't mean I agree with the above), it doesn't
make sense to use an ram_addr_t size when you return a 32bit address
on 32bit qemu build.