Re: kvm vmload/vmsave vs tss.ist

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> I think it's enough to switch %rsp before incrementing irqcount, no?
>>>     
>>
>> no - that would introduce a small race: if an exception (say an NMI or  
>> MCE, or a debug trap) happens in that small window then the exception  
>> context thinks that it's on the IRQ stack already, and would use the 
>> task stack.
>>
>>   
>
> I'm suggesting
>
>    check irqcount
>    if (wasnt_in_irq)
>        rsp = irqstack
>    ++irqcount
>
> If the NMI happens before the increment, we'll switch the stack 
> unconditionally, and if the NMI happens after the increment, then we 
> won't switch the stack, but we're guaranteed to be on the irqstack 
> anyway.  The window size is negative :)
>
> Similarly, the exit path should be
>
>    oldstack_reg = oldstack;
>    --irqcount;
>    rsp = oldstack_register;
>
> To guarantee that by the time we decrement irqcount, we don't need the  
> stack anymore.

agreed, something like this would work too. My suggestion, to eliminate 
irqcount altogether and just check RSP against the known-irqstack-range, 
could result in slightly smaller (and thus faster) code, but it's a 
marginal difference at best.

	Ingo