From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] for_each_shadow_entry
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:25:19 -0200
Message-ID: <20081227232519.GA4114@amt.cnet>
References: <1230211419-2389-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55129 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754008AbYL0XZc (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:25:32 -0500
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBRNPVEp031717
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:25:31 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1230211419-2389-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 03:23:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> This patchset replaces walk_shadow(), which calls a callback for each
> shadow pte that maps a guest virtal address, by an equivalent for_each style
> construct.  Benefits are less thunks and smaller code.
> 
> Please review.

Looks good.