public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: Add MSI_ACTION flag for assigned irq
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:26:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812301826.13471.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4959F5B1.60100@redhat.com>

On Tuesday 30 December 2008 18:19:29 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Sheng Yang wrote:
> > For MSI disable feature later.
> >
> > Notice I changed ABI here, but due to no userspace patch, I think it's
> > OK.
>
> It's not okay, since eventually we will have userspace and it will have
> to work with older kernels as well.
>
> No released kernel has KVM_DEV_IRQ_ASSIGN_ENABLE_MSI, so it's fine,
> provided I fold this into the 2.6.29 submission.  However, why do this
> at all?  It can only cause confusion.

If we have ENABLE_MSI, and DISABLE, and ENABLE_MSIX, and DISABLE, and 
MASK_MSIX, and UNMASK, every two action are in pairs but we have to use twice 
bits to store them. So I'd like to use MSI_ACTION approach...

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-30 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-30  5:49 [0/3][RESEND] Device assignment code clean up and MSI disable support Sheng Yang
2008-12-30  5:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: Add MSI_ACTION flag for assigned irq Sheng Yang
2008-12-30 10:19   ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 10:26     ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2008-12-30 10:31       ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 10:34         ` Sheng Yang
2008-12-30 10:41           ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 10:48             ` Sheng Yang
2008-12-30  5:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: Use kvm_free_assigned_irq() for free irq Sheng Yang
2008-12-30 10:28   ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 11:11     ` Sheng Yang
2008-12-30 11:16       ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30 11:22         ` Sheng Yang
2008-12-30 11:27           ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30  5:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: Add support to disable MSI for assigned device Sheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812301826.13471.sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox