From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
joerg.roedel@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:43:50 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090107104350.GA4170@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496481AE.1060102@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:19:26PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Using this patch it works. But if I read it correctly, that doesn't
>> actually fix anything but only treats NPT/EPT special, which it
>> shouldn't, should it?
>
> The patch doesn't fix the bug but is nevertheless correct. cr4.pge only
> matters to the mmu if using the shadow mmu; with tdp it only wastes
> memory (and exposes the bug which you encountered).
>
> So, wrt to the bug you saw, it's a workaround, but it's also a correct
> fix for another bug.
>
>> Maybe this actually even breaks EPT?
>>
>
> It shouldn't.
>
>> I remember having seen a lot of CR4 hacks in svm.c when npt is enabled.
>> Maybe that is related?
>>
>
> No. cr4 controls the guest mmu, but with npt the guest mmu is
> completely virtualized, so we need to ignore those bits.
Let me shoot at one direction: a shadow page with PGE bit in either
state is created. Later that shadow page is nuked (via mmu notifiers,
for example). Then set_cr4 changes base_role.pge to a different value,
and a fault creates a new shadow page and instantiates that in the tree.
Perhaps a svm_flush_tlb is required in such case, when updating a
previously valid pagetable entry? Joerg?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081221184146.8E00B250012@cleopatra.tlv.redhat.com>
2009-01-05 14:56 ` [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings Alexander Graf
2009-01-06 10:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-06 14:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-06 14:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-06 15:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-06 16:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-07 6:49 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-07 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 10:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-01-07 11:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 13:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-08 19:53 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-09 0:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-09 10:43 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-11 9:12 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-11 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090107104350.GA4170@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox