From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: libkvm: support for irq routing Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:20:39 +0800 Message-ID: <200901151420.39324.sheng@linux.intel.com> References: <1231941191-966-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1231941191-966-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <200901151417.17178.sheng@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:24031 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbZAOGUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:20:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200901151417.17178.sheng@linux.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 15 January 2009 14:17:16 Sheng Yang wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 21:53:10 Avi Kivity wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity > > Do we need a lock for the table? And kvm_add_irq_route/kvm_del_irq_route should be generic used, how about transfer a kvm_irq_routing_entry as parameter? -- regards Yang, Sheng