From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: A new direction for vmchannel?
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:43:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20090123204347.GC17445@redhat.com>
References: <4979D80D.307@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvanhensbergen@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53264 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754265AbZAWUqD (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:03 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4979D80D.307@us.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:45:33AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Thoughts?
>
Looks good, but I am not to much familiar with p9. Will it provide us
with stream semantics? How much work is needed to support this in
Windows (what is your estimation)? Will migration be transparent to
in guest users?

--
			Gleb.