From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Judge MMIO based on PFN rather than HVA in EPT violation
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:29:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902111129.32148.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902111043.45193.sheng@linux.intel.com>
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 10:43:43 Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 February 2009 20:14:32 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Hi Sheng,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:43:41PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > One page can be unmapped from userspace, then HVA seems legal, but in
> > > fact, PFN is illegal.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > index 9913a1d..a4fa1b5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > @@ -3061,7 +3061,7 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu
> > > *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) u64 exit_qualification;
> > > enum emulation_result er;
> > > gpa_t gpa;
> > > - unsigned long hva;
> > > + pfn_t pfn;
> > > int gla_validity;
> > > int r;
> > >
> > > @@ -3086,8 +3086,8 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu
> > > *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) }
> > >
> > > gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> > > - hva = gfn_to_hva(vcpu->kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > - if (!kvm_is_error_hva(hva)) {
> > > + pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vcpu->kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > + if (!is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
> > > r = kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa & PAGE_MASK, 0);
> > > if (r < 0) {
> > > printk(KERN_ERR "EPT: Not enough memory!\n");
> >
> > Forgot to drop the additional reference acquired by gfn_to_pfn ?
>
> Sadly, yeah... :(
>
> > Hum, gfn_to_hva assumes the slot information is accurate, which is not
> > the case if you simply munmap a page in the middle of a slot... we
> > should provide a helper in userspace, and make sure nothing bad can
> > happen otherwise.
>
> Yes. But maintain a list in kernel seems a little complex for it. I checked
> the callings of gfn_to_hva, seems most of them are safe with a inaccurate
> result(not sure about host_largepage_backed, seems this would be affected
> if one 4k page was unmapped inside a large page).
>
> > Anyway, why don't you just let kvm_mmu_page_fault handle instruction
> > emulation instead of opencoding it in handle_ept_violation ?
>
> It didn't work as expect. Checking it.
Oh, seems it didn't work due to my fault... Update the patch, thanks for
reminder. :)
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 9:43 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Judge MMIO based on PFN rather than HVA in EPT violation Sheng Yang
2009-02-10 12:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-11 2:43 ` Sheng Yang
2009-02-11 3:29 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902111129.32148.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox