From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qcow2 corruption observed, fixed by reverting old change Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:43:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20090217004304.GC20713@shareable.org> References: <20090211070049.GA27821@shareable.org> <4992A108.8070304@suse.de> <20090211114126.GC31997@shareable.org> <4992C77D.4030104@suse.de> <20090211164814.GA7161@shareable.org> <49995FA4.3070508@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Laurent Vivier , kvm-devel To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:54206 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751270AbZBQAnH (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:43:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49995FA4.3070508@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> By the way and completely off-topic: Have you already tried to use the > >> VHD patches? I would really like to know if they fix your problems. > > > > Are those patches in kvm-83? I still have the image that was causing > > problems way back, and I'm converting it to raw now with kvm-83 to see > > if it now matches the raw image produced by VPC's own tool. > > Avi mentioned the patches in the kvm-84 announcement yesterday, so it > seems they are not in kvm-83. Ok. I did the conversion from VHD to raw with "kvm-83-img convert" and it gave a different result to MSVPC - i.e. wrong. I'll try it again sometime with kvm-84. -- Jamie