From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use bitmap ops on a bitmap instead of bit ops
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:19:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902271119.12359.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090226130339.GG8810@redhat.com>
On Thursday 26 February 2009 21:03:39 Gleb Natapov wrote:
> And don't zero bitmap twice. Assume that caller zeros it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> index 7c2cb2b..21627b9 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -170,12 +170,11 @@ void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct
> kvm_ioapic *ioapic, u8 dest,
>
> ioapic_debug("dest %d dest_mode %d\n", dest, dest_mode);
>
Hi Gleb
> - *mask = 0;
I think the caller should not assume anything about the output, so let
function itself do the clean is better. (however, not in this way for "mask"
should be KVM_MAX_VCPUS long.)
And, I found some other things are not proper after looking back code, I would
send a patch to fix it (deliver_bitmask in kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask).
> if (dest_mode == 0) { /* Physical mode. */
> if (dest == 0xFF) { /* Broadcast. */
> for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i)
> if (kvm->vcpus[i] && kvm->vcpus[i]->arch.apic)
> - *mask |= 1 << i;
> + __set_bit(i, *mask);
Should be __set_bit(i, mask)?
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
> return;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
> @@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic
> *ioapic, u8 dest, continue;
> if (kvm_apic_match_physical_addr(vcpu->arch.apic, dest)) {
> if (vcpu->arch.apic)
> - *mask = 1 << i;
> + __set_bit(i, *mask);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic
> *ioapic, u8 dest, continue;
> if (vcpu->arch.apic &&
> kvm_apic_match_logical_addr(vcpu->arch.apic, dest))
> - *mask |= 1 << vcpu->vcpu_id;
> + __set_bit(i, *mask);
> }
> ioapic_debug("mask %x\n", *mask);
> }
> --
> Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 13:03 [PATCH] use bitmap ops on a bitmap instead of bit ops Gleb Natapov
2009-02-27 3:19 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2009-02-27 13:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-03-02 7:12 ` Sheng Yang
2009-03-03 1:28 ` Sheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902271119.12359.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox