From: Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@linuxbox.cz>
To: Malinka Rellikwodahs <aelmalinka@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark van Walraven <markv@netvalue.net.nz>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz
Subject: Re: kvm-83 write performance raw
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:13:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303151324.GA7090@develbox.linuxbox.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa2a0fc0903021300o5934521fi8c571850939d27ce@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
I think DRBD *MIGHT* be Your problem anyways...
Can You try repeating Your measurments with
no-disk-barrier, no-disk-flushes, no-disk-drain
options for Your drbd devices and report the results?
nik
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 04:00:57PM -0500, Malinka Rellikwodahs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 15:53, Mark van Walraven <markv@netvalue.net.nz> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:11:59PM -0500, Malinka Rellikwodahs wrote:
> >> when running with a raw disk image as a file or a raw disk image on an
> >> lvm vg, I'm getting very low performance on write (5-10 MB/s) however
> >> when using qcow2 format disk image the write speed is much better
> >> (~30MB/s), which is consistant with a very similar setup running
> >> kvm-68. Unfortunately when running the test with qcow2 the system
> >> becomes unresponsive for a brief time during the test.
> >
> >> The host is running raid5 and drbd (drive replication software),
> >> however performance on the host is performaning well and avoiding the
> >> drbd layer in the guest does not improve performance, but running on
> >> qcow2 does.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts/suggestions of what could be wrong or what to do to fix this?
> >
> > RAID1 has *much* better write performance. With striping RAIDs, alignment
> > is important. RAID controllers sometimes introduce hidden alignment
> > offsets. Excessive read-ahead is a waste of time with a lot of small
> > random I/O, which is what I see mostly with guests on flat disk images.
> >
> > With LVM, it pays to make sure the LVs are aligned to the disk. I prefer
> > boundaries with multiples of at least 64-sectors, which makes the LVM
> > overhead virtually disappear. I align the guest filesystems too, when
> > I can.
> >
> > I don't think DRBD has an effect on alignment, but you might look at
> > keeping the metadata on another drive.
> >
> > Block - rather than file - images are much faster.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
>
> It does, however unless I'm missing something the performance is being
> lost not in the lvm/raid/drbd config, because I'm using the same setup
> for other partitions which are used for data on the host and write
> performance to those drives is just fine.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-02 20:11 kvm-83 write performance raw Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-02 20:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-02 20:37 ` Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-02 20:39 ` Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-02 21:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-02 21:39 ` Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-02 22:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-09 15:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-02 20:53 ` Mark van Walraven
2009-03-02 21:00 ` Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-03 15:13 ` Nikola Ciprich [this message]
[not found] ` <aa2a0fc0903051110q528da32ek17b0f6468d0f15ff@mail.gmail.com>
2009-03-05 19:11 ` Fwd: " Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-06 0:14 ` Malinka Rellikwodahs
2009-03-09 15:40 ` Fwd: " Nikola Ciprich
2009-03-04 22:28 ` Paolo Pedaletti
2009-03-05 2:09 ` Mark van Walraven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090303151324.GA7090@develbox.linuxbox.cz \
--to=extmaillist@linuxbox.cz \
--cc=aelmalinka@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markv@netvalue.net.nz \
--cc=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox