From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Merge kvm_ioapic_get_delivery_bitmask into kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:59:47 +0800
Message-ID: <200903041059.47652.sheng@linux.intel.com>
References: <1235981973-6740-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <200903041041.35016.sheng@linux.intel.com> <20090304025506.GA21902@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:10380 "EHLO
	orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750867AbZCDC7x (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:59:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090304025506.GA21902@amt.cnet>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wednesday 04 March 2009 10:55:06 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
>
> > > The spec says broadcast is not supported with lowest priority delivery
> > > mode, and that "must not be configured by software". I wonder what
> > > happens in HW if you do that.
> >
> > Um.. So you mean to prohibit this kind of action? OK.
>
> No, I'm just wondering what the HW does, and what are the implications
> of the (supposedly) different behaviour KVM emulates.

Well, no clue to how HW works... Maybe at least note this and warning guest is 
OK...

> > > Unrelated question, what was the issue (in detail) which caused
> > > this change again:
> >
> > I have dig out my old post (I thought you are also involved :) )
>
> Short memory :)
>
> Thanks, will read tomorrow.

:)