From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm: fix irq 0 assignment
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:58:31 +0800
Message-ID: <200903041758.31916.sheng@linux.intel.com>
References: <1236153269-8825-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <1236153269-8825-2-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <20090304095352.GA872200@puku.stupidest.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:6752 "EHLO
	fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752747AbZCDJ6g (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 04:58:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090304095352.GA872200@puku.stupidest.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:53:52 Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:54:27PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > Shouldn't update assigned irq if host irq is 0, which means
> > uninitialized or don't support INTx.
>
> Is that generally true?

Host irq 0 is reserved for PIT timer, at least for x86.

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng