Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm: fix irq 0 assignment

Sheng Yang
2009-03-04T09:58:36Z

On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:53:52 Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:54:27PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > Shouldn't update assigned irq if host irq is 0, which means
> > uninitialized or don't support INTx.
>
> Is that generally true?

Host irq 0 is reserved for PIT timer, at least for x86.

--
regards
Yang, Sheng