From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm: fix irq 0 assignment
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:02:51 +0800
Message-ID: <200903041802.51813.sheng@linux.intel.com>
References: <1236153269-8825-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <20090304095352.GA872200@puku.stupidest.org> <200903041758.31916.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:14900 "EHLO
	fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752841AbZCDKCz (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 05:02:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200903041758.31916.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:58:31 Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:53:52 Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:54:27PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > Shouldn't update assigned irq if host irq is 0, which means
> > > uninitialized or don't support INTx.
> >
> > Is that generally true?
>
> Host irq 0 is reserved for PIT timer, at least for x86.

Or in some other condition it would be used for pci/pcie device? And please 
notice that currently we only support assign with x86 and IA64. (I really feel 
there is some reason for you ask. :) )

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng