From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:06:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20090309100642.GD4578@redhat.com> References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com> <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm-devel To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39007 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752497AbZCIKJp (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 06:09:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? > > That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable > naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about > 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW. There's already some good stuff > in the stable tree. I think 0.10.1 makes perfect sense for next stable release name. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|