From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:32:53 +0000
Message-ID: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com>
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:52790 "EHLO
	mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750980AbZCIMc7 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:32:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

> >>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
> > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
> > latter)
>
> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).

Paul