public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	"jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] PCI: add SR-IOV API for Physical Function driver
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:37:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090310013753.GC5063@yzhao-otc.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090309193901.GA15011@kroah.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:39:01AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:25:05PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > > > +	pci_device_add(virtfn, virtfn->bus);
> > > 
> > > Greg is probably going to ding you here for adding the device, then
> > > creating the symlinks.  I believe it's now best practice to create the
> > > symlinks first, so there's no window where userspace can get confused.
> > 
> > Yes, but unfortunately we can't create links before adding a device.
> > I double checked device_add(), there is no place for those links to be
> > created before it sends uevent. So for now, we have to trigger another
> > uevent for those links.
> 
> What exactly are you trying to do with a symlink here that you need to
> do it this way?  I vaguely remember you mentioning this in the past, but
> I thought you had dropped the symlinks after our conversation about this
> very problem.

I'd like to create some symlinks to reflect the relationship between
Physical Function and its associated Virtual Functions. The Physical
Function is like a master device that controls the allocation of its
Virtual Functions and owns the device physical resource. The Virtual
Functions are like slave devices of the Physical Function. For example,
if 01:00.0 is a Physical Function and 02:00.0 is a Virtual Function
associated with 01:00.0. Then the symlinks (virtfnN and physfn) would
look like:

  $ ls -l /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:01:00.0/
  ...
  ...  virtfn0 -> ../0000:02:00.0
  ...  virtfn1 -> ../0000:02:00.1
  ...  virtfn2 -> ../0000:02:00.2
  ...

  $ ls -l /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:02:00.0/
  ...
  ... physfn -> ../0000:01:00.0
  ...

This is very useful for userspace applications, both KVM and Xen need
to know this kind of relationship so they can request the permission
from a Physical Function before using its associated Virtual Functions.

Thanks,
Yu

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-20  6:54 [PATCH v10 0/7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support Yu Zhao
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] PCI: initialize and release SR-IOV capability Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 20:08   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-06 22:03     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-03-06 23:31       ` Duyck, Alexander H
2009-03-07  2:38     ` Greg KH
2009-03-10  1:19       ` Yu Zhao
2009-03-11  4:36         ` Greg KH
2009-03-09  8:12     ` Yu Zhao
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] PCI: restore saved SR-IOV state Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 20:09   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] PCI: reserve bus range for SR-IOV device Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 20:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-09  8:13     ` Yu Zhao
2009-03-09 18:09       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-03-09 18:11         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] PCI: add SR-IOV API for Physical Function driver Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 20:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-06 21:48     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-03-09  8:29       ` Yu Zhao
2009-03-07  2:40     ` Greg KH
2009-03-09  8:25     ` Yu Zhao
2009-03-09 19:39       ` Greg KH
2009-03-10  1:37         ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2009-03-11  4:34           ` Greg KH
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] PCI: handle SR-IOV Virtual Function Migration Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 21:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-09  8:28     ` Yu Zhao
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] PCI: document SR-IOV sysfs entries Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 21:16   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-06 22:35     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-02-20  6:54 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] PCI: manual for SR-IOV user and driver developer Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 21:17   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-24 10:47 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support Avi Kivity
2009-02-25  1:36   ` Yu Zhao
2009-03-06 19:33   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-08 14:30     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-08 15:01       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-09  0:45         ` Greg KH
2009-03-09  3:42       ` Yang, Sheng
2009-03-09  4:35         ` Yang, Sheng
2009-03-09 13:45           ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-06 19:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-07  2:34   ` Greg KH
2009-03-10  1:11     ` Yu Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090310013753.GC5063@yzhao-otc.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yu.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox