From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v5] Device assignment improvement in userspace
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:50:43 -0300
Message-ID: <20090317145043.GA8088@amt.cnet>
References: <1236865019-30321-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <49BE1797.4010305@redhat.com> <20090316181211.GA3783@amt.cnet> <49BF700F.9050600@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50021 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751493AbZCQOwB (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:52:01 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49BF700F.9050600@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:40:31AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Maybe we want different ioctl pairs for guest and host?

Don't think it is necessary.