From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Linux AIO support when using O_DIRECT
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:32:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20090323173225.GA2168@infradead.org>
References: <1237823124-6417-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <49C7B620.8030203@redhat.com> <49C7C392.3030001@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:58750 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753716AbZCWRc2 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:32:28 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49C7C392.3030001@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:14:58PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> block-raw-posix needs a major overhaul.  That's why I'm not even  
> considering committing the patch as is.

I have some WIP patches that split out the host device bits into
separate files to get block-raw-posix down to the pure file handling
bits without all the host-specific host device mess.  But it's at the
end of a really large pile, which needs to be rebases once we have the
patches already on the list in in some form.