From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: add irqfd support Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:47:43 +0300 Message-ID: <20090427104743.GA31112@redhat.com> References: <20090424042756.1896.90317.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43559 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752006AbZD0Ksq (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:48:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090424042756.1896.90317.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:30:17AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > +int kvm_irqfd(kvm_context_t kvm, int gsi) > +{ > + int fd, r; > + > + if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm, KVM_CAP_IRQFD)) > + return -ENOENT; > + > + fd = eventfd(0, 0); > + if (fd < 0) > + return fd; > + > + r = assign_irqfd(kvm, fd, gsi); > + if (r < 0) > + return r; Do we need to close fd on error? > + > + return fd; > +}