public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Discard shadow_mt_mask
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:44:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904271944.51775.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240825665-15016-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com>

On Monday 27 April 2009 17:47:44 Sheng Yang wrote:
> mt_mask is out of date, now it have only been used as a flag to indicate if
> TDP enabled. Get rid of it and use tdp_enabled instead.
>

(seems my gmail account delayed?)

This one break SVM bisect. Would update soon.

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng

> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              |    8 +++-----
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |    3 +--
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index cb306cf..ba6906f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_set_nonpresent_ptes(u64 trap_pte, u64 notrap_pte);
>  void kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes(u64 base_pte);
>  void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
> -		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 mt_mask);
> +		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask);
>
>  int kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 5b79afa..55c6923 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static u64 __read_mostly shadow_x_mask;	/* mutual
> exclusive with nx_mask */ static u64 __read_mostly shadow_user_mask;
>  static u64 __read_mostly shadow_accessed_mask;
>  static u64 __read_mostly shadow_dirty_mask;
> -static u64 __read_mostly shadow_mt_mask;
>
>  static inline u64 rsvd_bits(int s, int e)
>  {
> @@ -199,14 +198,13 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes(u64 base_pte)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes);
>
>  void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
> -		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 mt_mask)
> +		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask)
>  {
>  	shadow_user_mask = user_mask;
>  	shadow_accessed_mask = accessed_mask;
>  	shadow_dirty_mask = dirty_mask;
>  	shadow_nx_mask = nx_mask;
>  	shadow_x_mask = x_mask;
> -	shadow_mt_mask = mt_mask;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes);
>
> @@ -1670,7 +1668,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
> *shadow_pte, {
>  	u64 spte;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	u64 mt_mask = shadow_mt_mask;
> +	u64 mt_mask;
>
>  	/*
>  	 * We don't set the accessed bit, since we sometimes want to see
> @@ -1690,7 +1688,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
> *shadow_pte, spte |= shadow_user_mask;
>  	if (largepage)
>  		spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
> -	if (mt_mask) {
> +	if (tdp_enabled) {
>  		if (!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn)) {
>  			mt_mask = get_memory_type(vcpu, gfn) <<
>  				kvm_x86_ops->get_mt_mask_shift();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index c6997c0..85db8b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -3796,8 +3796,7 @@ static int __init vmx_init(void)
>  		kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes(VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK |
>  			VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK);
>  		kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(0ull, 0ull, 0ull, 0ull,
> -				VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK,
> -				VMX_EPT_DEFAULT_MT << VMX_EPT_MT_EPTE_SHIFT);
> +				VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK);
>  		kvm_enable_tdp();
>  	} else
>  		kvm_disable_tdp();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 8cb8542..76adda4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2768,7 +2768,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>  	kvm_mmu_set_nonpresent_ptes(0ull, 0ull);
>  	kvm_mmu_set_base_ptes(PT_PRESENT_MASK);
>  	kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(PT_USER_MASK, PT_ACCESSED_MASK,
> -			PT_DIRTY_MASK, PT64_NX_MASK, 0, 0);
> +			PT_DIRTY_MASK, PT64_NX_MASK, 0);
>
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>  		per_cpu(cpu_tsc_khz, cpu) = tsc_khz;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-27 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-27  9:47 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Discard shadow_mt_mask Sheng Yang
2009-04-27  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Enable snooping control for supported hardware Sheng Yang
2009-04-27 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Discard shadow_mt_mask Sheng Yang
2009-04-27 11:44 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2009-04-27 22:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-28  0:54   ` Sheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904271944.51775.sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox