From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH] reserved-ram for pci-passthrough without VT-d capable hardware Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20090428180614.GL11953@random.random> References: <18C018878FB0244EB71B7FE328978A3222D0F9CB@rrsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> <20090427174310.GH11953@random.random> <18C018878FB0244EB71B7FE328978A3222D0FFB8@rrsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: "Passera, Pablo R" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47336 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756808AbZD1SGT (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:06:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18C018878FB0244EB71B7FE328978A3222D0FFB8@rrsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:35:26AM -0600, Passera, Pablo R wrote: > - Against which kernel version was this patch generated? I don't remember exactly (I was just using an upstream hg checkout and I didn't record its hash value) but I think you can go back to when e820.c was still shared and it'll likely apply and work. > - Did you try this on a 32 or 64 bits system? I only tested it on 64bit but there's no reason why it shouldn't work on 32bit too.