From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:01:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428210140.GD7604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F75F5F.1000501@codemonkey.ws>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:56:15PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> So to map vq 0 to vector 0, vq 1 to vector 1 and vq 2 to vector 2 the driver would do:
>>
>> struct virtio_interrupt_mapping mapping[3] = { {0, 0}, {1, 1}, {2, 2} };
>> vec = map_vqs_to_interrupt(dev, mapping, 3);
>> if (vec) {
>> error handling
>> }
>>
>> and then find_vq as usual.
>>
>
> Is it possible to just delay the msix enablement until after the queues
> have been finalized (IOW in virtio-pci.c:vp_finalize_features)?
Yes, but
1. vp_finalize_features returns void, while enabling requested
number of interrupts might fail.
2. we don't know in advance (without trying) whether we'll be able
to allocate a specific number of vectors.
So if we want to give drivers the flexibility to assign queues to
vectors, driver must request vectors, we'll try to allocate
and driver will decide what to do on failure.
After thinking about it, request_vqs was not a bad API for virtio, good
enough for existing drivers. And the PCI space can be made future proof
allowing mapping virtqueues to vectors in case we extend API later.
Thoughts?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 12:31 [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 14:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:06 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-27 15:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 16:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 6:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 17:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 17:51 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 18:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 19:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-28 21:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-05-04 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-04 11:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-04 11:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-27 14:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-27 17:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428210140.GD7604@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox