public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] execute kvm_init_vcpu in the end of pc_new_cpu
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:03:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506140320.GC26401@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090506135306.GC10705@amt.cnet>

On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:53:06AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:16:19PM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > When we create a new vcpu, we need to make sure that
> > all of the state it is going to use (apic state, for example)
> > already exists. We can do it nicely by making sure kvm_init_vcpu
> > is executed after everything else in cpu creation.
> > 
> > After that, the first call to KVM_SET_LAPIC ioctl will not find an
> > existant vcpu. So we introduce a function that tell us that the vcpu
> > is already initialized, and is it safe to call the ioctl. Otherwise,
> > just don't botter.
> 
> Why did you decide to drop the additional wait vcpu->inited thing you
> had in the previous patch? I think its nice to make the synchronization
> explicit. 
Explicit is good. Not needed is even better.

If we make sure to call kvm_vcpu_init() after everything is already initialized,
we avoid the need to have any kind of sync at all, since it serializes
naturally.

> 
> Isnt your current solution somewhat trickier?
I believe it is simpler.

> 
> And if you disagree with me (which you should avoid for safety reasons),
> you need to regenerate the patch since it'll reject against qemu-kvm.git
> as of today.
I can do that happily (both disagreeing with you, and regenerating the patch)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-06  3:16 [PATCH] execute kvm_init_vcpu in the end of pc_new_cpu Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 13:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-06 14:03   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-06 14:10 Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 14:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-05-06 15:17   ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-06 15:43     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090506140320.GC26401@poweredge.glommer \
    --to=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox