From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Implement generic double fault generation mechanism
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:38 +0300
Message-ID: <20090508121638.GE25357@redhat.com>
References: <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A80F02A3@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20090503105330.GL9795@redhat.com> <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A81A8E83@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20090508095336.GD25357@redhat.com> <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A81A8EFE@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:51113 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1762799AbZEHMQk (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 May 2009 08:16:40 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9832F13BD22FB94A829F798DA4A8280501A81A8EFE@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:39:06PM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> ction will be re-executed.
> >> 
> >> Do you want it to be covered for now? For exception, it is easy but
> >> for IRQ, it needs to be pushed back. 
> >> 
> > Yes I want it to be covered now otherwise any serial exception
> > generates flood of "Exception happens serially" messages. This
> > function does not handle IRQ so no problem there.
> 
> But we soon will let this function cove IRQ as well per SDM.
> Why not do that a little bit later?
> 
> BTW, this issue exist in original code as well.
> 
Yes, but I've already sent a patch to fix this in existing code. It
your patch will fix this to I'll drop my version.

--
			Gleb.