From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Userspace changes for configuring irq0->inti2 override (v3) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:52:00 +0300 Message-ID: <20090512105200.GE19446@redhat.com> References: <1242062986-29383-1-git-send-email-eak@us.ibm.com> <1242062986-29383-2-git-send-email-eak@us.ibm.com> <20090512095345.GB19446@redhat.com> <4A094DCE.3080109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Beth Kon , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53365 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbZELKwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 06:52:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A094DCE.3080109@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:22:06PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) { >>> - r = kvm_add_irq_route(kvm_context, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i); >>> + if (i == 0) { >>> + r = kvm_add_irq_route(kvm_context, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2); >>> + } else if (i != 2) { >>> + r = kvm_add_irq_route(kvm_context, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i); >>> + } >>> >> There is no entry for IRQ2, is this OK? What happens if IRQ2 triggers? >> > > irq 2 is the PIC cascade interrupt. If it is somehow triggered, the > kernel will ignore it. > But here we configure IOAPIC routing. What if IOAPIC is used for interrupt delivery and something triggers irq2. There is no entry describing it in IOAPIC routing table, so what gsi it will be mapped to? -- Gleb.