From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set bit 1 in disabled processor's _STA Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:58:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20090518065802.GM3909@redhat.com> References: <1242389683-12967-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20090517082347.GG3909@redhat.com> <20090517132741.GL27295@poweredge.glommer> <20090517143006.GJ3909@redhat.com> <20090517150622.GN27295@poweredge.glommer> <20090517152145.GA21386@redhat.com> <20090517154703.GP27295@poweredge.glommer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com To: Glauber Costa Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52575 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755404AbZERG6E (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 02:58:04 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4I6w5IU014675 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:58:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090517154703.GP27295@poweredge.glommer> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:47:03PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote: > I admitedly know almost nothing about windows, but one thing jumped to my eyes: > By looking at the device manager, hidden devices, the "working" cpu seems to be > cpu1, not cpu0. Maybe this is related to this problem? I think this is just peculiarity of a device manager GUI. For me it shows CPUs in the order: 10-14 0-9 so working CPU appears to be fifth on the cpu list. -- Gleb.