From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"'dwmw2@infradead.org'" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org'"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"'kvm@vger.kernel.org'" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Intel-IOMMU, intr-remap: source-id checking
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:32:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090519093227.GF31404@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C054568FA16@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>
* Han, Weidong <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Han, Weidong <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:16 -0700, Han, Weidong wrote:
> >>>> @@ -634,6 +694,44 @@ static int ir_parse_ioapic_scope(struct
> >>>> acpi_dmar_header *header, " 0x%Lx\n",
> >>>> scope->enumeration_id, drhd->address);
> >>>>
> >>>> + bus = pci_find_bus(drhd->segment, scope->bus);
> >>>> + path = (struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *)(scope + 1); + count =
> >>>> (scope->length - + sizeof(struct acpi_dmar_device_scope))
> >>>> + / sizeof(struct acpi_dmar_pci_path);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + while (count) {
> >>>> + if (pdev)
> >>>> + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (!bus)
> >>>> + break;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + pdev = pci_get_slot(bus,
> >>>> + PCI_DEVFN(path->dev, path->fn));
> >>>> + if (!pdev)
> >>>> + break;
> >>>
> >>> ir_parse_ioapic_scope() happens very early in the boot. So, I
> >>> don't think we can do the pci related discovery here.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your pointing it out. It should enable the source-id
> >> checking for io-apic's after the pci subsystem is up. I will
> >> change it.
> >
> > Note, there's ways to do early PCI quirks too, check
> > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c. It's done by reading the PCI
> > configuration space directly via a careful early-capable subset of
> > the PCI config space APIs.
> >
> > But it's a method of last resort.
> >
>
> Thanks for your reminder. It can use direct PCI access here as follows. It's easy and clean. I think it's better than adding the source-id checking for io-apic's after the pci subsystem is up. I will send out updated patches after some tests.
>
> @@ -634,6 +695,24 @@ static int ir_parse_ioapic_scope(struct acpi_dmar_header *header,
> " 0x%Lx\n", scope->enumeration_id,
> drhd->address);
>
> + bus = scope->bus;
> + path = (struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *)(scope + 1);
> + count = (scope->length -
> + sizeof(struct acpi_dmar_device_scope))
> + / sizeof(struct acpi_dmar_pci_path);
> +
> + while (--count > 0) {
> + /* Access PCI directly due to the PCI
> + * subsystem isn't initialized yet.
> + */
> + bus = read_pci_config_byte(bus, path->dev,
> + path->fn, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
> + path++;
> + }
> +
> + ir_ioapic[ir_ioapic_num].bus = bus;
> + ir_ioapic[ir_ioapic_num].devfn =
> + PCI_DEVFN(path->dev, path->fn);
looks good IMO, beyond the obligatory comment-style nitpick [*] :-)
Also, the function above seems to be way too large - please split it
into a couple of natural helper functions.
Thanks,
Ingo
[*]
Please use the customary comment style:
/*
* Comment .....
* ...... goes here:
*/
specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 6:16 [PATCH 1/2] Intel-IOMMU, intr-remap: set the whole 128bits of irte when modify/free it Weidong Han
2009-05-07 6:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] Intel-IOMMU, intr-remap: source-id checking Weidong Han
2009-05-07 18:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-05-11 6:22 ` Han, Weidong
2009-05-11 13:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 9:46 ` Han, Weidong
2009-05-19 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-05-19 10:34 ` Han, Weidong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090519093227.GF31404@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox