From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v8 7/7] tracing: add kprobe-based event tracer Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 04:15:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20090530081526.GC15755@infradead.org> References: <20090529000326.17532.70868.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090529000353.17532.71995.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , lkml , systemtap , kvm , DLE , Christoph Hellwig , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Frederic Weisbecker , Tom Zanussi To: Masami Hiramatsu Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44560 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013AbZE3IP3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2009 04:15:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090529000353.17532.71995.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:03:53PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Add kprobes-based event tracer on ftrace. Wouldn't it make more sense to call this the dynamic event tracer? The use of kprobes is more an implementation detail than something the user cares about.