Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: virtual device as irq injection interface

Avi Kivity
2009-06-01T12:04:30Z

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> A potential compromise is to investigate the POLLHUP technique that
> Davide mentioned so that kvmfd can get notified of the closure without
> needing an additional explicit ioctl to do it. Note that we already
> have irqfd in the tree so I assume we would need to do this in a ABI
> friendly way, but its possible.
>

We don't have irqfd in any released tree. I'm only submitting it for
2.6.32 (exactly so we can iron these things out), so we can change it
any way we like or even pull it out completely.

The POLLHUP stuff is something I'd like to see in.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function