From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] always halt non-bsp cpu.
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:40:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090602224031.GZ30777@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A25A864.2070006@web.de>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:32:04AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:01:00AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>>>> This is not kvm specific, and should do fine in plain qemu
> >>>> This is fine with plain qemu already. The problem, IIUC, is that
> >>>> in-kernel kvm irqchip does not have a chance to remove the halted state
> >>>> again. Did you test the effect of this patch on that scenario? What
> >>>> makes it safe to be removed now?
> >>> IIRC, the in kernel irqchip sets halted = 0 in the very beginning of
> >>> the vcpu initialization.
> >>>
> >>> It is tested here with in-kernel irqchip and works, so probably not
> >>> a problem, unless you can spot something.
> >> At least your patch applied alone breaks -smp >1 here.
> >>
> >> But the whole management of env->halted for the in-kernel irqchip in
> >> qemu-kvm is a bit hacky IMHO. Maybe it's time to rethink this. Would be
> >> nice to always see a consistent halted in user space, specifically for
> >> debugging purposes.
> > out of curiosity: did you apply the whole series?
>
> Meanwhile I did, but it makes no difference.
ok, thanks for testing.
I'll take a look at that tomorrow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-02 19:37 [PATCH 0/4] Provide kvm-free implementations of apic/ioapic Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 19:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] always halt non-bsp cpu Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] sipi and init: move common code Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 19:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] provide a kvm-free implementation of apic Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 19:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] provide a kvm-free implementation of ioapic Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] always halt non-bsp cpu Jan Kiszka
2009-06-02 21:23 ` Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 22:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-02 22:09 ` Glauber Costa
2009-06-02 22:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-02 22:40 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-06-03 1:01 ` Glauber Costa
2009-06-03 11:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-03 1:23 ` Glauber Costa
2009-06-03 11:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-03 11:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-06-03 10:32 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090602224031.GZ30777@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox