public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: avi@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch 2/6] KVM: MMU audit: update count_writable_mappings / count_rmaps
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:27:04 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610152747.558682414@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090610152702.666650177@localhost.localdomain

[-- Attachment #1: mmu-audit-1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4081 bytes --]

Under testing, count_writable_mappings returns a value that is 2 integers
larger than what count_rmaps returns.

Suspicion is that either of the two functions is counting a duplicate (either
positively or negatively). 

Modifying check_writable_mappings_rmap to check for rmap existance on
all present MMU pages fails to trigger an error, which should keep Avi
happy.

Also introduce mmu_spte_walk to invoke a callback on all present sptes visible
to the current vcpu, might be useful in the future.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -3020,6 +3020,55 @@ static gva_t canonicalize(gva_t gva)
 	return gva;
 }
 
+
+typedef void (*inspect_spte_fn) (struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+				 u64 *sptep);
+
+static void __mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+			    inspect_spte_fn fn)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; ++i) {
+		u64 ent = sp->spt[i];
+
+		if (is_shadow_present_pte(ent)) {
+			if (sp->role.level > 1 && !is_large_pte(ent)) {
+				struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
+				child = page_header(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+				__mmu_spte_walk(kvm, child, fn);
+			}
+			if (sp->role.level == 1)
+				fn(kvm, sp, &sp->spt[i]);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, inspect_spte_fn fn)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+
+	if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa))
+		return;
+	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.shadow_root_level == PT64_ROOT_LEVEL) {
+		hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa;
+		sp = page_header(root);
+		__mmu_spte_walk(vcpu->kvm, sp, fn);
+		return;
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+		hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu.pae_root[i];
+
+		if (root && VALID_PAGE(root)) {
+			root &= PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
+			sp = page_header(root);
+			__mmu_spte_walk(vcpu->kvm, sp, fn);
+		}
+	}
+	return;
+}
+
 static void audit_mappings_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 page_pte,
 				gva_t va, int level)
 {
@@ -3112,9 +3161,47 @@ static int count_rmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *
 	return nmaps;
 }
 
-static int count_writable_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *sptep)
+{
+	unsigned long *rmapp;
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *rev_sp;
+	gfn_t gfn;
+
+	if (*sptep & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) {
+		rev_sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
+		gfn = rev_sp->gfns[sptep - rev_sp->spt];
+
+		if (!gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn)) {
+			if (!printk_ratelimit())
+				return;
+			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no memslot for gfn %ld\n",
+					 audit_msg, gfn);
+			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: index %ld of sp (gfn=%lx)\n",
+					audit_msg, sptep - rev_sp->spt,
+					rev_sp->gfn);
+			dump_stack();
+			return;
+		}
+
+		rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, rev_sp->gfns[sptep - rev_sp->spt], 0);
+		if (!*rmapp) {
+			if (!printk_ratelimit())
+				return;
+			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no rmap for writable spte %llx\n",
+					 audit_msg, *sptep);
+			dump_stack();
+		}
+	}
+
+}
+
+void audit_writable_sptes_have_rmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, inspect_spte_has_rmap);
+}
+
+static void check_writable_mappings_rmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int nmaps = 0;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
 	int i;
 
@@ -3131,20 +3218,16 @@ static int count_writable_mappings(struc
 				continue;
 			if (!(ent & PT_WRITABLE_MASK))
 				continue;
-			++nmaps;
+			inspect_spte_has_rmap(vcpu->kvm, sp, &pt[i]);
 		}
 	}
-	return nmaps;
+	return;
 }
 
 static void audit_rmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int n_rmap = count_rmaps(vcpu);
-	int n_actual = count_writable_mappings(vcpu);
-
-	if (n_rmap != n_actual)
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: (%s) rmap %d actual %d\n",
-		       __func__, audit_msg, n_rmap, n_actual);
+	check_writable_mappings_rmap(vcpu);
+	count_rmaps(vcpu);
 }
 
 static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -3178,6 +3261,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_audit(struct kvm_vcp
 	audit_rmap(vcpu);
 	audit_write_protection(vcpu);
 	audit_mappings(vcpu);
+	audit_writable_sptes_have_rmaps(vcpu);
 	dbg = olddbg;
 }
 

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-02 21:36 [patch 0/4] mmu audit update Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-02 21:36 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: MMU audit: update count_writable_mappings / count_rmaps Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-08  9:24   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-09 12:33     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-09 12:40       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-02 21:36 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: MMU audit: update audit_write_protection Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-02 21:36 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: MMU audit: nontrapping ptes in nonleaf level Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-02 21:36 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: MMU audit: audit_mappings tweaks Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-08  9:29   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-07  7:14 ` [patch 0/4] mmu audit update Avi Kivity
2009-06-10 15:27   ` [patch 0/6] mmu audit update v4 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-10 15:27     ` [patch 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce is_last_spte helper Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-10 15:27     ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-06-10 15:27     ` [patch 3/6] KVM: MMU audit: update audit_write_protection Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-10 15:27     ` [patch 4/6] KVM: MMU audit: nontrapping ptes in nonleaf level Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-10 15:27     ` [patch 5/6] KVM: MMU audit: audit_mappings tweaks Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-10 15:27     ` [patch 6/6] KVM: MMU audit: largepage handling Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-11 14:24     ` [patch 0/6] mmu audit update v4 Avi Kivity
2009-06-09 13:13 ` [patch 0/4] mmu audit update v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-09 13:13   ` [patch 1/4] KVM: MMU audit: update count_writable_mappings / count_rmaps Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-09 13:13   ` [patch 2/4] KVM: MMU audit: update audit_write_protection Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-09 13:13   ` [patch 3/4] KVM: MMU audit: nontrapping ptes in nonleaf level Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-09 13:13   ` [patch 4/4] KVM: MMU audit: audit_mappings tweaks Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090610152747.558682414@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox