From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Start using KVMState Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:29:59 -0300 Message-ID: <20090618132959.GE3517@poweredge.glommer> References: <1244488224-31171-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4A3A05A0.2070504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:38172 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755463AbZFRNXs (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:23:48 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5IDNpRT026412 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:23:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A3A05A0.2070504@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:15:12PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/08/2009 10:10 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: >> Guys, >> >> This is to address the feedback I received in the last attempt. >> > > Does this fix the tpr patching regression? What was the problem? > > It always helps to explicitly list changes and add a version number to > patchsets, to help maintainers with limited memory capacity. No, forget about these one. The one you should apply is the one that moves libkvm into qemu-kvm for i386. Subj is [PATCH] get rid of target-i386/libkvm.c There is no tpr patching regression, since you said you did not push my previous series (that removes the callbacks). It (get rid of ...) will just prevent it from happening whenever I send it again.